Hi There, to ease settings of DiSEqc/LNBs, I need LOF/SLOF values. E.G MWI circular Universal LNB AP82-T4C for Russia.
How does diseqc.conf file looks with mixes Universal LNBs and single range LNBs, like C-Band LNBs.
Specaly information (disecq.conf with LNB-Type) from Asia, Africa or South America are nice.
thanx for help
regards markus
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 16:58, Markus Hahn wrote:
Here is small snippet for 36E. On this sat position will be used circular polarization
S36.0E 00000 V 10750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 FC] W15 A W15 t S36.0E 99999 V 10750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 FD] W15 A W15 T S36.0E 00000 H 10750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 FE] W15 A W15 t S36.0E 99999 H 10750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 FF] W15 A W15 T
Cheers Oleg
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2006 14:43 schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
so it should be like this?? S36.0E 00000 V 10750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 FC] W15 A W15 t S36.0E 99999 R 10750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 FD] W15 A W15 T S36.0E 00000 H 10750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 FE] W15 A W15 t S36.0E 99999 L 10750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 FF] W15 A W15 T
@KLS
what`s the point with this strange SLOF (Switch Local OszilatorFreqency) is it possible to calculate it from Hi an Lo LOF?
regards movimax
Markus Hahn wrote:
I don't think that mixing V/H and R/L on the same satellite is done - or is it?
In nit.c the polarization will be set to h, v, r, or l, depending on the data broadcast for a particular transponder. The data in diseqc.conf has to use H/V or R/L correspondingly.
# slof: switch frequency of LNB; the first entry with # an slof greater than the actual transponder # frequency will be used
Example:
S19.2E 11700 V 9750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t S19.2E 99999 V 10600 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
Everything below (and including) 11700 will be considered "low band" and will use the first DiSEqC line. Everything above 11700 will be "high band" and use the second line. There could even be more than two lines, dividing the frequency range into more sections.
In the original data above, the 00000 will cause _all_ transponders to use that line, and the 99999 line will never be used. Don't know why he did that.
Klaus
Am Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2006 10:43 schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
yes it is - just on 36E i.e.
so shouldn't this be S36.0E 99999 V 10750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 FC] W15 A W15 t S36.0E 99999 R 10750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 FD] W15 A W15 T S36.0E 99999 H 10750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 FE] W15 A W15 t S36.0E 99999 L 10750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 FF] W15 A W15 T ?
i am also not shure if switching the voltage with the 6th field is needed or useful with a circular LNB. So shouldn't this be left away?
Thiemo