On 6/25/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Torgeir Veimo</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:torgeir@pobox.com">torgeir@pobox.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style=""><span class="q">
<br><div><div>On 25 Jun 2007, at 11:41, Chris Jones wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="margin: 0px;">Hi</div><div style="margin: 0px; min-height: 14px;"><br></div><div style="margin: 0px;">Laz wrote:</div>
 <blockquote type="cite"><div style="margin: 0px;">I did read stuff a while back about people getting USB disconnects from<span>&nbsp;</span></div><div style="margin: 0px;">them at random but I&#39;ve never seen that with mine.
</div> </blockquote><div style="margin: 0px; min-height: 14px;"><br></div><div style="margin: 0px;">Are we saying that the Hauppauge USB dual tuner ones work? That would</div><div style="margin: 0px;">seriously make my day!
</div></blockquote><br></div></span><div>The nova-t 500 is a PCI card, but has an internal USB bus.</div><div><br></div><div>The nova-t 500 doesn&#39;t work reliably at my location. An older nova-t works very well.&nbsp;The problem is with transmissions where the actual transmission frequency doesn&#39;t match the frequency in the PAT/PMT tables, or if using automatic settings for inversion, qam, hierarchy etc. See log below when tuning with w_scan.
</div><div><br></div><div>The nova-t 500s remote sensor doesn&#39;t work yet.</div><div><br></div><div>I wouldn&#39;t recommend this card for use under linux at the moment. It&#39;s a hit or miss.</div></div></blockquote>
<div><br>Well the T500 is working well for us in multiple machines (one has 3 x T500&#39;s installed) under Kubuntu 7.04 and Kernel 2.6.20-15-generic. We are using the Hauppauge remote successfully with MS mce compatible IR receivers.
<br>&nbsp;</div><br></div><br>